https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198864 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to the benefit under Notification No. 49/2000 as it was not in force at the relevant time. Additionally, the appellant's claim for benefit under Notification No. 28/97 was denied due to non-alignment of export obligations with the requirements for exemption. The Tribunal upheld the authority's decision, denying the benefits under both notifications, and consequently, the appeal was dismissed in its entirety. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:19:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198864 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to the benefit under Notification No. 49/2000 as it was not in force at the relevant time. Additionally, the appellant's claim for benefit under Notification No. 28/97 was denied due to non-alignment of export obligations with the requirements for exemption. The Tribunal upheld the authority's decision, denying the benefits under both notifications, and consequently, the appeal was dismissed in its entirety. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198864