<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1286 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198868</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, allowing dealers to deduct input tax from output tax liability regardless of invoice timing. It ruled that the 2015 amendment, permitting input tax credit for purchases made in the prior five months, should have retrospective effect from April 1, 2005. The court quashed impugned orders and notices of demand, granting petitioners the freedom to address any additional issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1286 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198868</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, allowing dealers to deduct input tax from output tax liability regardless of invoice timing. It ruled that the 2015 amendment, permitting input tax credit for purchases made in the prior five months, should have retrospective effect from April 1, 2005. The court quashed impugned orders and notices of demand, granting petitioners the freedom to address any additional issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>