https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198869 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, due to a delay of 161 days. The Court held that the appellant failed to establish due diligence and good faith required under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of delay. It was clarified that Section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked to extend the appeal period beyond what is allowed under the Electricity Act. The appeal and the application for condonation of delay were both dismissed, emphasizing adherence to specific limitation periods and requirements of due diligence and good faith. en-us Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198869 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, due to a delay of 161 days. The Court held that the appellant failed to establish due diligence and good faith required under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of delay. It was clarified that Section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked to extend the appeal period beyond what is allowed under the Electricity Act. The appeal and the application for condonation of delay were both dismissed, emphasizing adherence to specific limitation periods and requirements of due diligence and good faith. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198869