<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 953 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198858</link>
    <description>The appeal against the ITAT judgment was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the income derived from labor was business income due to the commercial exploitation of assets and the long-standing nature of the business. The Tribunal also concluded that the income credited as labor income was not from undisclosed sources but from commercial asset exploitation. The Tribunal deleted the disallowed interest expenditure as the income was deemed business income. The Tax Appeal was ultimately dismissed based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 953 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198858</link>
      <description>The appeal against the ITAT judgment was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the income derived from labor was business income due to the commercial exploitation of assets and the long-standing nature of the business. The Tribunal also concluded that the income credited as labor income was not from undisclosed sources but from commercial asset exploitation. The Tribunal deleted the disallowed interest expenditure as the income was deemed business income. The Tax Appeal was ultimately dismissed based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>