<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 605 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355184</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court dealt with a procedural reference in which no substantive issue was finally decided. The Court directed the Tribunal to file a supplemental statement of case so that the reference could be properly answered. The reference was therefore kept pending for further directions, with the operative effect limited to completion of the record rather than determination of the underlying dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:34:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 605 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355184</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court dealt with a procedural reference in which no substantive issue was finally decided. The Court directed the Tribunal to file a supplemental statement of case so that the reference could be properly answered. The reference was therefore kept pending for further directions, with the operative effect limited to completion of the record rather than determination of the underlying dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>