<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 599 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 1,52,305/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as the notice issued by the Assessing Officer was found to be defective for not specifying the charge of offense. Following judicial precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, leading to the cancellation of the penalty and a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 599 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 1,52,305/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as the notice issued by the Assessing Officer was found to be defective for not specifying the charge of offense. Following judicial precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, leading to the cancellation of the penalty and a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>