<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 593 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355172</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to delete the addition of profit made by the AO in a case involving a joint venture. It was determined that the joint venture, functioning as a pass-through entity with minimal expenses, could not be taxed as an Association of Persons (AOP). The Tribunal emphasized that the joint venture did not possess the essential attributes required for tax liability as an AOP, based on legal precedents and interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 593 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355172</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to delete the addition of profit made by the AO in a case involving a joint venture. It was determined that the joint venture, functioning as a pass-through entity with minimal expenses, could not be taxed as an Association of Persons (AOP). The Tribunal emphasized that the joint venture did not possess the essential attributes required for tax liability as an AOP, based on legal precedents and interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>