<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 590 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355169</link>
    <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2) because the tax authorities could not disregard its statutory classification. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision and the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., and held that Citizens Co-operative Society did not apply since that case involved a credit co-operative society whose activities and nominal-member structure took it outside the exemption. It also noted that the Banking Regulation Act framework did not justify treating the assessee as a co-operative bank for denial of the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 590 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355169</link>
      <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2) because the tax authorities could not disregard its statutory classification. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision and the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., and held that Citizens Co-operative Society did not apply since that case involved a credit co-operative society whose activities and nominal-member structure took it outside the exemption. It also noted that the Banking Regulation Act framework did not justify treating the assessee as a co-operative bank for denial of the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>