<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 586 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355165</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the classification of imported oil. They concluded that the Commissioner (Appeals) should not have relied on the first test report that had been set aside. The retest report confirming the absence of mineral oil justified the classification under heading 3402. Therefore, the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by restoring the Order-in-Original.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 586 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355165</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the classification of imported oil. They concluded that the Commissioner (Appeals) should not have relied on the first test report that had been set aside. The retest report confirming the absence of mineral oil justified the classification under heading 3402. Therefore, the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by restoring the Order-in-Original.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>