https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355161 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's miscellaneous application seeking to recall the final order, emphasizing that the appeal was disposed of on merits and not for non-prosecution. Despite the appellant's claim of non-receipt of the hearing notice, the Tribunal found no substantiated evidence supporting this assertion. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of timely communication and adherence to procedural requirements, ultimately concluding that there were no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. en-us Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:31:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355161 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's miscellaneous application seeking to recall the final order, emphasizing that the appeal was disposed of on merits and not for non-prosecution. Despite the appellant's claim of non-receipt of the hearing notice, the Tribunal found no substantiated evidence supporting this assertion. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of timely communication and adherence to procedural requirements, ultimately concluding that there were no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355161