<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 579 - ATFEMA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355158</link>
    <description>Penalty for alleged abetment of contravention of foreign exchange law requires clear evidence linking the person to the prohibited transaction. Mere inference from conduct or non-appearance, without a factual investigation or specific material showing participation, is insufficient. Where the record does not establish abetment, common intention, or direct involvement in the fraudulent transfer of foreign exchange, the penalty cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 579 - ATFEMA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355158</link>
      <description>Penalty for alleged abetment of contravention of foreign exchange law requires clear evidence linking the person to the prohibited transaction. Mere inference from conduct or non-appearance, without a factual investigation or specific material showing participation, is insufficient. Where the record does not establish abetment, common intention, or direct involvement in the fraudulent transfer of foreign exchange, the penalty cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>