https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355149 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an independent distributor facing service tax demands for received commissions from distributing products. The Tribunal set aside the demand for the extended period due to limitation issues, overturned penalties, and remanded for quantification within the normal period. It was determined that there was no suppression or misstatement of facts to evade tax, aligning with a previous case law. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings regarding service tax quantification for the normal period. en-us Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:30:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355149 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an independent distributor facing service tax demands for received commissions from distributing products. The Tribunal set aside the demand for the extended period due to limitation issues, overturned penalties, and remanded for quantification within the normal period. It was determined that there was no suppression or misstatement of facts to evade tax, aligning with a previous case law. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings regarding service tax quantification for the normal period. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355149