<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 47 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11829</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for reconsideration regarding the entitlement to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the need for the assessee to prove that the expenditure aligns with the specified sub-clauses of the Act and placed the burden of proof on the company to establish eligibility for the deduction. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was challenged due to the failure to specify the sub-clause of section 35B(1)(b) under which the claim fell and the lack of sufficient evidence demonstrating that the expenses were incurred for business purposes as required by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 47 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11829</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for reconsideration regarding the entitlement to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the need for the assessee to prove that the expenditure aligns with the specified sub-clauses of the Act and placed the burden of proof on the company to establish eligibility for the deduction. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was challenged due to the failure to specify the sub-clause of section 35B(1)(b) under which the claim fell and the lack of sufficient evidence demonstrating that the expenses were incurred for business purposes as required by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>