<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 559 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in CCE v. Accurate Meters Ltd., held that transportation charges separately invoiced and charged to buyers are not to be included in the assessable value for central excise duty purposes. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside based on the interpretation of Rule 5 of Valuation Rules. This decision clarified that transportation charges, when separately identified in invoices, should not be factored into the calculation of excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:30:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 559 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in CCE v. Accurate Meters Ltd., held that transportation charges separately invoiced and charged to buyers are not to be included in the assessable value for central excise duty purposes. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside based on the interpretation of Rule 5 of Valuation Rules. This decision clarified that transportation charges, when separately identified in invoices, should not be factored into the calculation of excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>