<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 551 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355130</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty levy on the firm and its partner, modifying the order accordingly. The duty demand and interest were paid before the show cause notice, leading to the cancellation of the penalty based on legal precedents. The rest of the order was upheld, and the appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:30:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 551 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355130</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty levy on the firm and its partner, modifying the order accordingly. The duty demand and interest were paid before the show cause notice, leading to the cancellation of the penalty based on legal precedents. The rest of the order was upheld, and the appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>