https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355123 The Tribunal dismissed both parties' appeals in a case involving the refund of accumulated cenvat credit. The Revenue's challenge on the eligibility of service tax credit was rejected, citing precedents supporting the classification of services as input services. The appellant's argument against restricting cash refund to a specific quarter was also dismissed, emphasizing compliance with Form A and a specific notification. The judgment highlights the importance of adhering to regulatory requirements for refund claims and clarifies criteria for cenvat credit refunds, ensuring consistency and compliance in such matters. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355123 The Tribunal dismissed both parties' appeals in a case involving the refund of accumulated cenvat credit. The Revenue's challenge on the eligibility of service tax credit was rejected, citing precedents supporting the classification of services as input services. The appellant's argument against restricting cash refund to a specific quarter was also dismissed, emphasizing compliance with Form A and a specific notification. The judgment highlights the importance of adhering to regulatory requirements for refund claims and clarifies criteria for cenvat credit refunds, ensuring consistency and compliance in such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355123