<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 543 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355122</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for remand to the adjudicating authority for denovo consideration after the final judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Indsur Global Ltd. The impugned order was set aside based on the Tribunal&#039;s practice of remanding similar matters pending the Supreme Court&#039;s final ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:29:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 543 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355122</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for remand to the adjudicating authority for denovo consideration after the final judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Indsur Global Ltd. The impugned order was set aside based on the Tribunal&#039;s practice of remanding similar matters pending the Supreme Court&#039;s final ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>