<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 528 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355107</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the duty demand on &quot;ready-made garments&quot; imposed on M/s Abhishek Corporation Ltd, a 100% export-oriented unit. The tribunal confirmed the duty demand, penalties, and confiscation of goods due to non-compliance with approved manufacturing operations and clearance for domestic tariff area. The appellant&#039;s exemption claim was rejected as the goods were not included in the list of permitted items for manufacture and export. The tribunal emphasized the duty liability under section 3A of the Central Excise Act for such units and dismissed the appeal, affirming the duty demand and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 08:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 528 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355107</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the duty demand on &quot;ready-made garments&quot; imposed on M/s Abhishek Corporation Ltd, a 100% export-oriented unit. The tribunal confirmed the duty demand, penalties, and confiscation of goods due to non-compliance with approved manufacturing operations and clearance for domestic tariff area. The appellant&#039;s exemption claim was rejected as the goods were not included in the list of permitted items for manufacture and export. The tribunal emphasized the duty liability under section 3A of the Central Excise Act for such units and dismissed the appeal, affirming the duty demand and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>