https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355106 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the availing of CENVAT credit on inputs used for manufacturing exempted products. The appellant, a boiler manufacturer, contended the inability to segregate inputs for dutiable and exempt goods, proposing payment for all inputs to claim credit. With no evidence of exclusive use for exempted goods and compliance with Rule 6(3)(i) by paying the required amount, the Tribunal overturned the order, emphasizing the necessity of distinguishing between inputs for dutiable and exempt goods and the appellant's fulfillment of obligations under the rules. en-us Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:29:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355106 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the availing of CENVAT credit on inputs used for manufacturing exempted products. The appellant, a boiler manufacturer, contended the inability to segregate inputs for dutiable and exempt goods, proposing payment for all inputs to claim credit. With no evidence of exclusive use for exempted goods and compliance with Rule 6(3)(i) by paying the required amount, the Tribunal overturned the order, emphasizing the necessity of distinguishing between inputs for dutiable and exempt goods and the appellant's fulfillment of obligations under the rules. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355106