<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 523 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355102</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Additional Commissioner&#039;s revisional powers under Section 64(1) of the KVAT Act, finding the reassessment proceedings valid within the extended limitation period set by retrospective amendments to Section 40. The court determined that the retention period for books of accounts under Section 32 extends until the reassessment concludes. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Additional Commissioner&#039;s revisional order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 523 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355102</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Additional Commissioner&#039;s revisional powers under Section 64(1) of the KVAT Act, finding the reassessment proceedings valid within the extended limitation period set by retrospective amendments to Section 40. The court determined that the retention period for books of accounts under Section 32 extends until the reassessment concludes. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Additional Commissioner&#039;s revisional order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>