https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198836 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Respondent's objection that the 71-day delay in filing exceeded the statutory limit under Section 125 of the Electricity Act. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of the limitation period, stating that neither Section 14 of the Limitation Act nor Article 142 of the Constitution could be invoked to condone the delay. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the order condoning the delay was disregarded, affirming the importance of adhering to statutory provisions in filing appeals. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:28:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198836 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Respondent's objection that the 71-day delay in filing exceeded the statutory limit under Section 125 of the Electricity Act. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of the limitation period, stating that neither Section 14 of the Limitation Act nor Article 142 of the Constitution could be invoked to condone the delay. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the order condoning the delay was disregarded, affirming the importance of adhering to statutory provisions in filing appeals. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198836