<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1628 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198836</link>
    <description>A special limitation scheme under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 permits an appeal within 60 days, with a further extension not exceeding 60 days on sufficient cause, and the outer limit is mandatory. Once that ceiling expires, the appeal cannot be entertained and delay beyond it is not condonable. Article 142 cannot be used to override this express statutory bar, because a court must respect a legislature-fixed limitation regime. Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply unless the earlier proceeding was pursued with due diligence and good faith; time spent in a review filed after expiry of the relevant period could not be excluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1628 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198836</link>
      <description>A special limitation scheme under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 permits an appeal within 60 days, with a further extension not exceeding 60 days on sufficient cause, and the outer limit is mandatory. Once that ceiling expires, the appeal cannot be entertained and delay beyond it is not condonable. Article 142 cannot be used to override this express statutory bar, because a court must respect a legislature-fixed limitation regime. Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply unless the earlier proceeding was pursued with due diligence and good faith; time spent in a review filed after expiry of the relevant period could not be excluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>