<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1693 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198845</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the order confirming the demand of duty, interest, and penalty on both appellants for their involvement in issuing fake invoices without the actual movement of excisable goods. The tribunal found that the Revenue successfully proved the appellants&#039; participation in the issuance of fake invoices, leading to the imposition of penalties in accordance with the Central Excise Rules. The appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1693 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198845</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the order confirming the demand of duty, interest, and penalty on both appellants for their involvement in issuing fake invoices without the actual movement of excisable goods. The tribunal found that the Revenue successfully proved the appellants&#039; participation in the issuance of fake invoices, leading to the imposition of penalties in accordance with the Central Excise Rules. The appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>