<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1302 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order-in-original, dismissing both appeals and affirming the duty liability and penalty imposed. The Commissioner&#039;s accurate calculation of duty in compliance with the Supreme Court&#039;s order was deemed correct, with no identified errors. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of the Supreme Court&#039;s direction, concluding that there were no grounds for interference with the Commissioner&#039;s implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1302 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order-in-original, dismissing both appeals and affirming the duty liability and penalty imposed. The Commissioner&#039;s accurate calculation of duty in compliance with the Supreme Court&#039;s order was deemed correct, with no identified errors. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of the Supreme Court&#039;s direction, concluding that there were no grounds for interference with the Commissioner&#039;s implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>