https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198855 Coercive recovery of a disputed tax demand may be restrained pending disposal of statutory appeals where the assessee has already paid part of the demand, furnished bank guarantees for the balance, and the delay in hearing the appeals is not attributable to the assessee. Applying Section 63(7)(b) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, the HC protected the assessee from recovery action until the appeals are decided and directed the appellate tribunal to dispose of the pending appeals expeditiously within three months. The operative effect was interim protection against recovery combined with a time-bound mandate for appellate adjudication. en-us Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:28:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198855 Coercive recovery of a disputed tax demand may be restrained pending disposal of statutory appeals where the assessee has already paid part of the demand, furnished bank guarantees for the balance, and the delay in hearing the appeals is not attributable to the assessee. Applying Section 63(7)(b) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, the HC protected the assessee from recovery action until the appeals are decided and directed the appellate tribunal to dispose of the pending appeals expeditiously within three months. The operative effect was interim protection against recovery combined with a time-bound mandate for appellate adjudication. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198855