<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1349 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the provisional attachment of properties worth Rs. 1.21 crore under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding procedural lapses and violations of natural justice were dismissed as the Tribunal found no prejudice caused and insufficient evidence to refute the allegations of money laundering. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and all pending applications were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1349 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the provisional attachment of properties worth Rs. 1.21 crore under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding procedural lapses and violations of natural justice were dismissed as the Tribunal found no prejudice caused and insufficient evidence to refute the allegations of money laundering. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and all pending applications were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>