https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198827 The court held that the suit challenging the arbitration agreement for being fabricated and seeking a permanent injunction against arbitration is not maintainable. The court emphasized that such suits are barred by the Arbitration Act and Specific Relief Act. The court affirmed the jurisdiction of the arbitrator to decide on the agreement's validity, found no procedural impropriety in the arbitrator's appointment, and upheld the arbitral award, reducing the interest rate. The court dismissed both the Regular Second Appeal (RSA) and the Original Miscellaneous Petition (OMP), imposing costs on the parties. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:52:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198827 The court held that the suit challenging the arbitration agreement for being fabricated and seeking a permanent injunction against arbitration is not maintainable. The court emphasized that such suits are barred by the Arbitration Act and Specific Relief Act. The court affirmed the jurisdiction of the arbitrator to decide on the agreement's validity, found no procedural impropriety in the arbitrator's appointment, and upheld the arbitral award, reducing the interest rate. The court dismissed both the Regular Second Appeal (RSA) and the Original Miscellaneous Petition (OMP), imposing costs on the parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198827