<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 876 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198826</link>
    <description>Equitable interim injunction was denied where the applicants suppressed material facts, including an undisclosed memorandum of understanding and partnership arrangement, because candour is essential to discretionary relief. The pleadings were also found too vague to support allegations of fraud, breach of trust, or misuse of confidential material, as they lacked specific particulars of the alleged drawings, designs, and documents. The Court further held that a lawful competing business could not be restrained in the absence of an enforceable contractual restriction or statutory monopoly. Industrial drawings and designs used for manufacture, being unregistered, did not establish a prima facie copyright or proprietary entitlement to interim protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 876 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198826</link>
      <description>Equitable interim injunction was denied where the applicants suppressed material facts, including an undisclosed memorandum of understanding and partnership arrangement, because candour is essential to discretionary relief. The pleadings were also found too vague to support allegations of fraud, breach of trust, or misuse of confidential material, as they lacked specific particulars of the alleged drawings, designs, and documents. The Court further held that a lawful competing business could not be restrained in the absence of an enforceable contractual restriction or statutory monopoly. Industrial drawings and designs used for manufacture, being unregistered, did not establish a prima facie copyright or proprietary entitlement to interim protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>