https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198826 The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for an interim injunction, finding that they had suppressed material facts, failed to provide specific details of the alleged misappropriated designs, and could not claim restraint against the defendants' lawful trade. The court also concluded that the plaintiffs had not established their copyright in the industrial drawings and designs as they were not registered under the Designs Act. The balance of convenience was found to be in favor of the defendants. en-us Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:48:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198826 The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for an interim injunction, finding that they had suppressed material facts, failed to provide specific details of the alleged misappropriated designs, and could not claim restraint against the defendants' lawful trade. The court also concluded that the plaintiffs had not established their copyright in the industrial drawings and designs as they were not registered under the Designs Act. The balance of convenience was found to be in favor of the defendants. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198826