https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198823 The court found that the Plaintiffs had concealed material facts and misled the court in seeking an ad interim injunction against the Defendants. The court emphasized the importance of full disclosure and bona fide conduct, ultimately vacating the injunction. The Defendants, who were found in possession of the property, were not to be dislodged, and the Plaintiffs were directed not to interfere in Defendant No.1's business activities. Further proceedings were scheduled for September 6, 2010 before the Joint Registrar. en-us Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:36:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198823 The court found that the Plaintiffs had concealed material facts and misled the court in seeking an ad interim injunction against the Defendants. The court emphasized the importance of full disclosure and bona fide conduct, ultimately vacating the injunction. The Defendants, who were found in possession of the property, were not to be dislodged, and the Plaintiffs were directed not to interfere in Defendant No.1's business activities. Further proceedings were scheduled for September 6, 2010 before the Joint Registrar. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198823