<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1161 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198823</link>
    <description>A party seeking interim injunction must come to court with clean hands and satisfy the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury. Here, the plaintiffs had concealed material facts and were not in physical possession of the disputed first-floor portion, while the defendant was shown to be in settled possession. That suppression disentitled the plaintiffs to continued discretionary protection, so the ex parte restraint over the suit property was vacated. Limited protection was nevertheless maintained to prevent interference with the plaintiff&#039;s business activities pending final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:36:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1161 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198823</link>
      <description>A party seeking interim injunction must come to court with clean hands and satisfy the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury. Here, the plaintiffs had concealed material facts and were not in physical possession of the disputed first-floor portion, while the defendant was shown to be in settled possession. That suppression disentitled the plaintiffs to continued discretionary protection, so the ex parte restraint over the suit property was vacated. Limited protection was nevertheless maintained to prevent interference with the plaintiff&#039;s business activities pending final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>