https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198822 A plaintiff seeking an ad interim injunction must make full and frank disclosure; suppression of material communications concerning termination of the exclusive marketing arrangement was sufficient to deny discretionary relief. The Court also noted that the underlying commercial agreement was not shown to be specifically enforceable in the manner sought. On balance, restraint on the defendants would have caused serious business prejudice, while any loss to the plaintiff could be addressed in damages. The ex parte injunction was therefore vacated and the injunction application rejected, leaving the contractual dispute to be tried on its merits. en-us Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:23:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198822 A plaintiff seeking an ad interim injunction must make full and frank disclosure; suppression of material communications concerning termination of the exclusive marketing arrangement was sufficient to deny discretionary relief. The Court also noted that the underlying commercial agreement was not shown to be specifically enforceable in the manner sought. On balance, restraint on the defendants would have caused serious business prejudice, while any loss to the plaintiff could be addressed in damages. The ex parte injunction was therefore vacated and the injunction application rejected, leaving the contractual dispute to be tried on its merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198822