https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198821 A party seeking ex parte interim injunction must make full and candid disclosure of all material facts and documents, and suppression of stockist agreements and the true commercial relationship justified refusal of equitable relief. The decision also states that a registered proprietor cannot restrain a prior and continuous user of the same or a closely similar mark at the interlocutory stage merely by relying on registration, because vested rights and prior adoption remain protected. On that reasoning, the interim injunction was vacated, while the suit was left to proceed on the merits. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:05:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198821 A party seeking ex parte interim injunction must make full and candid disclosure of all material facts and documents, and suppression of stockist agreements and the true commercial relationship justified refusal of equitable relief. The decision also states that a registered proprietor cannot restrain a prior and continuous user of the same or a closely similar mark at the interlocutory stage merely by relying on registration, because vested rights and prior adoption remain protected. On that reasoning, the interim injunction was vacated, while the suit was left to proceed on the merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198821