https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198821 The court found in favor of the defendants in a trademark dispute over 'PRINCE'. It was established that the defendants had prior use of the mark, predating the plaintiff's adoption. The plaintiff was deemed to have suppressed material facts, leading to the denial of equitable relief in the form of an injunction. The court recognized the defendants' vested rights under the Trademarks Act and vacated the interim orders while directing the defendants to account for profits and disclaim any association with the plaintiff's goods. Further proceedings were scheduled for issue framing and evidence recording. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:05:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198821 The court found in favor of the defendants in a trademark dispute over 'PRINCE'. It was established that the defendants had prior use of the mark, predating the plaintiff's adoption. The plaintiff was deemed to have suppressed material facts, leading to the denial of equitable relief in the form of an injunction. The court recognized the defendants' vested rights under the Trademarks Act and vacated the interim orders while directing the defendants to account for profits and disclaim any association with the plaintiff's goods. Further proceedings were scheduled for issue framing and evidence recording. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198821