https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198819 The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for interim measures, citing lack of jurisdiction. The Court emphasized the parties' explicit choice of Singapore as the arbitration venue and application of Singapore law, excluding Indian courts' jurisdiction. Upholding the principles of comity of jurisdictions and forum non-conveniens, the Court concluded that Singapore was the appropriate forum for dispute resolution. The appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198819 The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for interim measures, citing lack of jurisdiction. The Court emphasized the parties' explicit choice of Singapore as the arbitration venue and application of Singapore law, excluding Indian courts' jurisdiction. Upholding the principles of comity of jurisdictions and forum non-conveniens, the Court concluded that Singapore was the appropriate forum for dispute resolution. The appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198819