https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198818 The defendant's appeal contesting the validity of the notice of ejectment was dismissed by the courts, upholding the plaintiff's right to eviction and arrears recovery. The impact of subsequent events, including proceedings initiated by the Haryana Urban Development Authority, led to the appellant being granted interim relief by the Supreme Court. The appellant's argument regarding the doctrine of eviction by title paramount was rejected as the necessary conditions were not met. The Court emphasized the importance of properly bringing subsequent events to its attention in civil litigation. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, granting the appellant three months to vacate the premises upon fulfilling specified conditions. en-us Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198818 The defendant's appeal contesting the validity of the notice of ejectment was dismissed by the courts, upholding the plaintiff's right to eviction and arrears recovery. The impact of subsequent events, including proceedings initiated by the Haryana Urban Development Authority, led to the appellant being granted interim relief by the Supreme Court. The appellant's argument regarding the doctrine of eviction by title paramount was rejected as the necessary conditions were not met. The Court emphasized the importance of properly bringing subsequent events to its attention in civil litigation. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, granting the appellant three months to vacate the premises upon fulfilling specified conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198818