<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 540 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198816</link>
    <description>The Company Law Board dismissed the reference, ruling that the respondents&#039; actions were commercial decisions made in good faith, not constituting fraud, misfeasance, persistent negligence, or breach of trust. There was no evidence of improper conduct warranting their removal, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 540 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198816</link>
      <description>The Company Law Board dismissed the reference, ruling that the respondents&#039; actions were commercial decisions made in good faith, not constituting fraud, misfeasance, persistent negligence, or breach of trust. There was no evidence of improper conduct warranting their removal, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>