<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 18 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11820</link>
    <description>A rent-capitalisation valuation based on ten times the net annual rent was treated as a reasonable method for determining market value, and the Tribunal&#039;s approach was upheld because no infirmity was shown. A deduction of Rs. 50,000 from fair market value was also allowed where the amount had been voluntarily disclosed and invested in the construction of the house property, and the exemption provision protected such disclosed assets from inclusion in net wealth for the relevant years. The overall position favoured the assessee, with both the valuation method and the claimed deduction sustained on the stated facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 18 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11820</link>
      <description>A rent-capitalisation valuation based on ten times the net annual rent was treated as a reasonable method for determining market value, and the Tribunal&#039;s approach was upheld because no infirmity was shown. A deduction of Rs. 50,000 from fair market value was also allowed where the amount had been voluntarily disclosed and invested in the construction of the house property, and the exemption provision protected such disclosed assets from inclusion in net wealth for the relevant years. The overall position favoured the assessee, with both the valuation method and the claimed deduction sustained on the stated facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>