https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198815 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the High Court to permit the amendment of the plaint and determine the correct interpretation of the disputed contract clause. The appellant's claim for a 20% increase in labor rates was upheld, and the suit was found maintainable under the Specific Relief Act, 1877. The Court emphasized that necessary amendments should be allowed to decide the real dispute between parties without causing injustice. The amendment, sought after the limitation period, was permitted as it did not introduce a new cause of action but provided an alternative approach to the existing facts. en-us Fri, 10 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198815 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the High Court to permit the amendment of the plaint and determine the correct interpretation of the disputed contract clause. The appellant's claim for a 20% increase in labor rates was upheld, and the suit was found maintainable under the Specific Relief Act, 1877. The Court emphasized that necessary amendments should be allowed to decide the real dispute between parties without causing injustice. The amendment, sought after the limitation period, was permitted as it did not introduce a new cause of action but provided an alternative approach to the existing facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198815