https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198809 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that the receiver could not bypass statutory eviction procedures and that the appellant's rights under the Bombay Rents Act must be respected. The court directed that any action against the appellant for alleged unauthorized constructions or illegal activities should be pursued through appropriate legal channels, ensuring the appellant's right to a fair trial. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the respective claims, leaving them to be adjudicated in proper legal proceedings. en-us Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:01:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198809 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that the receiver could not bypass statutory eviction procedures and that the appellant's rights under the Bombay Rents Act must be respected. The court directed that any action against the appellant for alleged unauthorized constructions or illegal activities should be pursued through appropriate legal channels, ensuring the appellant's right to a fair trial. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the respective claims, leaving them to be adjudicated in proper legal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198809