<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 546 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198807</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the lower courts&#039; findings that the agreement dated 11th May, 1975, was void under Section 23 of the Contract Act as it was against public policy and defeated the provisions of the Bombay Rent Act. The appeal was dismissed, and the cross objections filed by the respondents were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 15:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 546 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198807</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the lower courts&#039; findings that the agreement dated 11th May, 1975, was void under Section 23 of the Contract Act as it was against public policy and defeated the provisions of the Bombay Rent Act. The appeal was dismissed, and the cross objections filed by the respondents were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>