https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198805 The court held that the INDRP did not oust the jurisdiction of civil courts. The defendants' application to dismiss the suit was rejected as the court found that the INDRP only provided an alternative dispute resolution mechanism and did not offer complete relief for the plaintiffs' claims. The court emphasized that there was no binding arbitration agreement between the parties, and each party was responsible for their own costs. en-us Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:36:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198805 The court held that the INDRP did not oust the jurisdiction of civil courts. The defendants' application to dismiss the suit was rejected as the court found that the INDRP only provided an alternative dispute resolution mechanism and did not offer complete relief for the plaintiffs' claims. The court emphasized that there was no binding arbitration agreement between the parties, and each party was responsible for their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198805