https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198805 Civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC is excluded only by express bar or necessary implication, and that exclusion is not lightly inferred. The text states that the IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy did not create a comprehensive statutory forum capable of deciding trade mark infringement, passing off, transfer of domain name and rendition of accounts, and it also did not rest on a bilateral arbitration agreement binding the plaintiffs. Its limited remedial scope and the possibility of civil proceedings meant the suit was not barred, so rejection of the plaint was not maintainable. en-us Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:36:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198805 Civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC is excluded only by express bar or necessary implication, and that exclusion is not lightly inferred. The text states that the IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy did not create a comprehensive statutory forum capable of deciding trade mark infringement, passing off, transfer of domain name and rendition of accounts, and it also did not rest on a bilateral arbitration agreement binding the plaintiffs. Its limited remedial scope and the possibility of civil proceedings meant the suit was not barred, so rejection of the plaint was not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198805