<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 78 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11818</link>
    <description>Counter sales involving customs clearance fell within Explanation (aa) to Section 80HHC(4B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the sales were realised in convertible foreign exchange; on that basis, the statutory deduction was available. The challenge to the validity of Explanation (aa) was not pressed and was rejected. The assessees were therefore entitled to the benefit of Section 80HHC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 78 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11818</link>
      <description>Counter sales involving customs clearance fell within Explanation (aa) to Section 80HHC(4B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the sales were realised in convertible foreign exchange; on that basis, the statutory deduction was available. The challenge to the validity of Explanation (aa) was not pressed and was rejected. The assessees were therefore entitled to the benefit of Section 80HHC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>