<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 85 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11817</link>
    <description>The High Court concluded that the nursing home could be run by individuals who are not necessarily qualified doctors. It directed the Tribunal to reassess issues related to rental payments, income from the physiotherapy center, professional qualifications for operating the center, and income from the x-ray machine. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s previous decisions to be based on a mix of relevant and irrelevant considerations and ordered each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 85 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11817</link>
      <description>The High Court concluded that the nursing home could be run by individuals who are not necessarily qualified doctors. It directed the Tribunal to reassess issues related to rental payments, income from the physiotherapy center, professional qualifications for operating the center, and income from the x-ray machine. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s previous decisions to be based on a mix of relevant and irrelevant considerations and ordered each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>