https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198799 Wilful disobedience of restraint orders maintaining status quo over disputed structures was found where the record, including the Advocate Commissioner's report, photographs and the respondents' own memo, showed demolition had progressed and been completed. The explanation of prior demolition or safety-related removal was rejected for want of contemporaneous disclosure and convincing proof. The Board also treated its statutory and inherent powers as sufficient to address abuse of process, and recognised that contempt action could be pursued before the High Court for disobedience of a subordinate quasi-judicial body's orders. The apologies tendered were found unsatisfactory and no action under Section 15(2) was called for. en-us Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:53:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198799 Wilful disobedience of restraint orders maintaining status quo over disputed structures was found where the record, including the Advocate Commissioner's report, photographs and the respondents' own memo, showed demolition had progressed and been completed. The explanation of prior demolition or safety-related removal was rejected for want of contemporaneous disclosure and convincing proof. The Board also treated its statutory and inherent powers as sufficient to address abuse of process, and recognised that contempt action could be pursued before the High Court for disobedience of a subordinate quasi-judicial body's orders. The apologies tendered were found unsatisfactory and no action under Section 15(2) was called for. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198799