https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198792 A civil court cannot direct restitution or re-delivery of property after an ex parte eviction order is set aside unless such power is conferred by express statutory provision or necessary intendment. Although restitution is not confined only to Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court cannot assume a broader inherent power in the absence of legal authority. The earlier view treating restitution as available ex debito justitiae was not accepted in light of the later Division Bench ruling, and the order directing re-delivery was held erroneous. en-us Sat, 21 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:05:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198792 A civil court cannot direct restitution or re-delivery of property after an ex parte eviction order is set aside unless such power is conferred by express statutory provision or necessary intendment. Although restitution is not confined only to Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court cannot assume a broader inherent power in the absence of legal authority. The earlier view treating restitution as available ex debito justitiae was not accepted in light of the later Division Bench ruling, and the order directing re-delivery was held erroneous. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 21 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198792