<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Flawed Evaluation of Related Party Transaction: Only 2% of Paper Board Deals Reviewed, No Demand Justified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37896</link>
    <description>Valuation - paper board - related party transaction - the sole attempt made by the de novo adjudicating authority was only to compare 2% of the transactions during the period which has also been done in a very flawed manner - No demand could be made - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 08:33:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 08:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Flawed Evaluation of Related Party Transaction: Only 2% of Paper Board Deals Reviewed, No Demand Justified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37896</link>
      <description>Valuation - paper board - related party transaction - the sole attempt made by the de novo adjudicating authority was only to compare 2% of the transactions during the period which has also been done in a very flawed manner - No demand could be made - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 08:33:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>