<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 514 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355093</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and condoned the delay in filing the revision petition. The matter was remanded to the respondents to take a decision on the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 264 of the Act on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the authorized representative of the petitioner. No costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 514 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355093</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and condoned the delay in filing the revision petition. The matter was remanded to the respondents to take a decision on the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 264 of the Act on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the authorized representative of the petitioner. No costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>