<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 511 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355090</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act was allowed for statistical purposes by the Appellate Tribunal. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification and fresh adjudication to determine if the investments were made from surplus funds or amounts payable to members, and to consider any related expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized the need for additional investigation, directing a reassessment of the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:48:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 511 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355090</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act was allowed for statistical purposes by the Appellate Tribunal. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification and fresh adjudication to determine if the investments were made from surplus funds or amounts payable to members, and to consider any related expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized the need for additional investigation, directing a reassessment of the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>