<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 502 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355081</link>
    <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered and classified under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 was treated as entitled to deduction under section 80P(2) of the Income-tax Act, because the jurisdictional High Court had already held that tax authorities cannot disregard the State-law classification of such a society. The Tribunal distinguished Citizens Co-operative Society on facts, noting that that decision concerned a society dealing substantially with nominal members and public deposits in a manner inconsistent with its governing statute, whereas the Kerala Act includes nominal members within the definition of member. The Banking Regulation Act did not alter the assessee&#039;s status for section 80P purposes, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 502 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355081</link>
      <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered and classified under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 was treated as entitled to deduction under section 80P(2) of the Income-tax Act, because the jurisdictional High Court had already held that tax authorities cannot disregard the State-law classification of such a society. The Tribunal distinguished Citizens Co-operative Society on facts, noting that that decision concerned a society dealing substantially with nominal members and public deposits in a manner inconsistent with its governing statute, whereas the Kerala Act includes nominal members within the definition of member. The Banking Regulation Act did not alter the assessee&#039;s status for section 80P purposes, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>