<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 495 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355074</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order passed by the first respondent without costs. The connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions (WMPs) were also dismissed. However, the petitioner was granted liberty to proceed with the revision petition before the third respondent, subject to the issuance of the Notification appointing an officer in the rank of Principal Commissioner as the Revisional Authority under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 495 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355074</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order passed by the first respondent without costs. The connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions (WMPs) were also dismissed. However, the petitioner was granted liberty to proceed with the revision petition before the third respondent, subject to the issuance of the Notification appointing an officer in the rank of Principal Commissioner as the Revisional Authority under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>