https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355065 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Allahabad set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not liable for service tax as a business auxiliary service provider. The Tribunal based its decision on a precedent where a similar issue was considered, emphasizing that since the company had already paid service tax on the gross receipts, and the agents had received commissions on the taxed amount, no further service tax liability arose for the appellant. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:46:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355065 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Allahabad set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not liable for service tax as a business auxiliary service provider. The Tribunal based its decision on a precedent where a similar issue was considered, emphasizing that since the company had already paid service tax on the gross receipts, and the agents had received commissions on the taxed amount, no further service tax liability arose for the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355065