<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 480 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the taxable event for the discharge of service tax liability for March 2008 is the date of rendering taxable services, not the realization of payment. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing legal precedents and court decisions highlighting the importance of service provision over payment realization in service tax matters. This ruling clarifies the distinction between the two events in determining service tax liability, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 480 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the taxable event for the discharge of service tax liability for March 2008 is the date of rendering taxable services, not the realization of payment. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing legal precedents and court decisions highlighting the importance of service provision over payment realization in service tax matters. This ruling clarifies the distinction between the two events in determining service tax liability, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>