https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355056 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Nitin Industries, holding that the show cause notice demanding duty, interest, and penalty was not sustainable. The Tribunal found that the appellant had not violated the law/rules regarding job work, as they had maintained proper records and accounts of goods sent and received. Emphasizing compliance with relevant rules and proper documentation, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and granted consequential relief to the appellant. The decision highlighted the importance of adherence to prescribed procedures in job work transactions to prevent discrepancies and duty evasion allegations. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355056 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Nitin Industries, holding that the show cause notice demanding duty, interest, and penalty was not sustainable. The Tribunal found that the appellant had not violated the law/rules regarding job work, as they had maintained proper records and accounts of goods sent and received. Emphasizing compliance with relevant rules and proper documentation, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and granted consequential relief to the appellant. The decision highlighted the importance of adherence to prescribed procedures in job work transactions to prevent discrepancies and duty evasion allegations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355056